Hoxhunt vs Competitors: Head-to-Head Comparison (Based on 6,000+ Reviews)

Interested in using Hoxhunt, but want to check out the competition first?

Below, we'll deep dive into the most popular alternatives and exactly what customers are saying about them.

*All insights below are based on real customer reviews.

‍

Hoxhunt: adaptive, gamified training

Ease of use

• Admins find that Hoxhunt's intuitive interface makes it simple for employees to report phishing emails directly from their inbox.
• Integrations with email platforms are seamless and user-friendly.
• Dashboards and notifications are straightforward and do not require security teams to have advanced technical skills.
• Users appreciate the control they have over automation. Hoxhunt allows you to run phishing simulations on autopilot or control the selection, targeting and training frequency.

Training content quality

• Users find that gamified features such as rewards, achievements, and rankings effectively boost user participation.
• Hoxhunt uses adaptive simulations that tailor emails to employees' locations, job roles and skill level.
• Some users express concerns around using gamified training, however this method has consistently proven to boost participation and engagement (Hoxhunt customers tend to see 90%+ engagement rate).

Realism of simulations

• Simulations are highly realistic and mimic actual phishing attempts.
• Simulated phishing attacks are based on 100k+ real world threats reported through the Hoxhunt network to keep up with the evolving threat landscape.
• Covers advanced cyber threats like deepfake attacks and smishing.
• Some users mention that employees might not want to participate in frequent cybersecurity training, although data shows Hoxhunt customers report a 60% success rate after first year of training through consistent, regular training.

Reporting features

• Customers appreciate the robust reporting features, which provide insights into employee performance and engagement with security training.
• Reports include metrics on click rates, dwell time, simulation participation etc.
• Users highlight the value of executive-level dashboards, which make it easier to communicate human risk assessment results to stakeholders.

Quality of support

• Customers frequently mention Hoxhunt's support team as being highly responsive, knowledgeable, and proactive in resolving issues.
• The platform is praised for providing customer success teams who help organizations achieve their training goals and implement best practices.
• Onboarding is smooth, with clear guidance provided by the Hoxhunt Team.

‍

KnowBe4: large library, legacy solution

Ease of use

• The KnowBe4 platform is user-friendly and easy to navigate.
• Some users report that the user interface can feel outdated compared to newer platforms.
• Some users find managing content cumbersome .

Training content quality

• Offers a wide library of training content, covering diverse topics such as phishing, compliance, and social engineering.
• Gamification features, such as leaderboards and badges.
• Content quality varies; some materials are considered too simple for advanced learners.
• Limited personalization options for training to suit specific organizational needs.

Realism of simulations

• Phishing simulations reflect real-world threats.
• The ability to customize simulations adds flexibility for admins.
• Some users feel that the simulations become predictable over time, reducing effectiveness.
• There is room for more dynamic difficulty scaling in phishing campaigns.

Reporting features

• Reporting tools allow admins to track employee progress and identify areas for improvement
• Integration with other security tools for reporting is robust.
• The interface for viewing reports can be overwhelming and challenging to navigate.
• Limited granularity in certain reports makes it harder to drill down into specific metrics.

Quality of support

• The support team is generally responsive and knowledgeable, assisting with implementation and troubleshooting.
• Ample online resources, such as tutorials and FAQs.
• Some users report delayed responses during peak times.
• Higher-tier support services may require additional costs, which can be a drawback for smaller organizations.

 G2 Comparison Report: Hoxhunt vs KnowBe4

‍

Proofpoint: email security and basic training

Ease of use

• Customers appreciate the integration of Proofpoint's email security and training tools into existing systems, particularly Office 365.
• The admin interface is intuitive for some users, especially those with prior experience in email security solutions.
• Users report a steep learning curve, particularly for configuring advanced features.
• Managing complex settings for phishing simulations can feel clunky.

Training content quality

• Proofpoint's training content is comprehensive, with a focus on real-world scenarios.
• The security awareness training uses engaging, interactive content and gamified elements such as rewards and leaderboards.
• Many users find the training content repetitive and less engaging over time.
• Limited customization options for training modules to suit unique organizational needs.

Realism of simulations

• Simulated phishing campaigns are realistic and designed to mimic modern cyber threats.
• Some users feel the phishing templates lack sufficient variety, leading to predictability over time.
• Simulations may not always scale well for large organizations with diverse roles.

Reporting features

• Reporting tools provide valuable insights into employee performance and vulnerabilities.
• Dashboards allow administrators to track trends over time.
• Reports can be overly complex, making it difficult to extract actionable insights for some users.
• Limited options for exporting or customizing reports to align with specific compliance needs.

Quality of support

• Support staff are knowledgeable and responsive.
• Extensive documentation and resources help with self-service troubleshooting.
• Support response times can vary, with some customers experiencing delays during critical issues.
• Advanced support often comes at a premium, which may not suit smaller businesses.

G2 Comparison Report: Hoxhunt vs Proofpoint

‍

MetaCompliance: awareness and compliance

Ease of use

• Users appreciate MetaCompliance's straightforward interface.
• The platform is highly customizable, allowing organizations to align it with their branding and compliance requirements.
• Some users find the initial setup challenging due to the depth of customization available.
• Admin functions can sometimes feel unintuitive, leading to a steeper learning curve for new users.

Training content quality

• The training content is visually engaging and focuses on key compliance issues like GDPR, cybersecurity, and data protection.
• Regular updates ensure the relevance of training materials to evolving cyber risks.
• Content can feel overly compliance-focused, lacking broader cybersecurity training scenarios.
• Some users find the material less dynamic or interactive compared to competitors, which can impact employee engagement.

Realism of simulations

• Simulations mimic real-world compliance and phishing threats.
• Users report limited variety in simulation scenarios, which can reduce long-term training effectiveness.
• The realism of phishing simulations is not as advanced as some competitors.
• Simulations have to be manually initiated and are delivered randomly.

Reporting features

• The platform provides clear, easy-to-read reports that help admins track employee performance and compliance gaps.
• Customizable reporting options are appreciated for aligning insights with specific organizational needs.
• Advanced reporting features can be difficult to locate or configure for less experienced users.
• Limited integration with third-party analytics tools compared to more sophisticated platforms.

Quality of support

• Customer support is generally praised for its responsiveness and willingness to help resolve issues promptly.
• Support staff demonstrate strong knowledge of the platform and compliance training.
• Occasional delays in resolving more complex or technical issues.
• Limited support documentation for self-service troubleshooting, requiring users to rely on direct assistance.

G2 Comparison Report: Hoxhunt vs MetaCompliance

‍

SoSafe: localized training 

Ease of use

• Many users find SoSafe easy to navigate.
• The platform is praised for being straightforward for both admins and participants.
• Some customers report challenges with integrating SoSafe into existing systems, particularly for larger organizations.
• Some users find the initial setup to be complex and time-consuming. 
• Occasional feedback mentions difficulty in navigating more advanced features.

Training content quality

• Users commend the engaging and visually appealing training materials.
• Content customization options are frequently highlighted, allowing businesses to tailor training to specific organizational needs.
• A few reviews suggest that the training content can feel repetitive over time.
• While the visuals are engaging, some users believe the depth of cybersecurity training could be expanded.

Realism of simulations

• Realistic simulations receive positive feedback for effectively preparing users against actual threats.
• SoSafe’s simulation variety allows organizations to test employees on different attack vectors.
• Some users feel the simulations lack the sophistication of advanced phishing tactics seen in real threats.
• Limited customization options for phishing simulations were noted by a subset of reviewers.

Reporting features

• Reporting capabilities are often described as user-friendly and clear, offering insights on employee performance.
• Admins mention the platform's detailed analytics, helping them identify vulnerabilities in employee behavior.
• Some reviewers find the reporting dashboards lack depth compared to competitors, particularly in larger-scale deployments.
• Integration with third-party tools for advanced reporting is limited.
• Some users mention that SoSafe doesn't provide true human risk reporting with somewhat simple metrics.

Quality of support

• Customers generally praise the support team’s responsiveness and problem-solving ability.
• Support staff are noted for their helpfulness in addressing technical challenges during implementation.
• A few customers report slower response times during high-demand periods.
• Limited documentation for troubleshooting independently is a recurring critique.

G2 Comparison Report: Hoxhunt vs Sosafe

‍

Hoxhunt competitors comparison chart

‍

Why organizations choose Hoxhunt

Hoxhunt was designed to measurably reduce human cyber risk, at scale.

What separates Hoxhunt from other security awareness training solutions? We'll we apply gamification and automated personalization to engage employees, ensuring they have the skills needed to combat real-life, sophisticated attacks.

Increase participation and build a strong security culture: Bite-sized training moments, personalized for every employee, improve learning and bring participation rates up to 72% on average.

Uncover and eliminate real phishing attacks: A dynamic training library based on the latest social engineering attacks influences real behaviors so that 60% of employees report at least 1 real attack within the first year of training.

Automate training at scale so you can focus on what matters: With Hoxhunt, automation goes way beyond scheduling emails, so you can truly scale training creation and delivery with fewer resources. 

_Sources

^{Hoxhunt Reviews and Comparisons – G2, 2024; Software Advice, 2024; TrustRadius, 2024; Gartner, 2024
KnowBe4 Security Awareness Reviews and Comparisons – Gartner, 2024; Corporate Compliance Insights, 2024
Proofpoint Email Protection & Essentials Reviews – TrustRadius, 2024; SoftwareReviews, 2024; Expert Insights, 2024
MetaCompliance Security Awareness Training Feedback – G2, 2024; TrustRadius, 2024; Gartner Comparison with KnowBe4, 2024
SoSafe Feedback and Comparisons – Gartner, 2024; FeaturedCustomers, 2024; SoftwareReviews, 2024}